What do you imagine unions will look like in the future why
For the better part of four decades, workers have been more productive than ever, creating massive amounts of wealth—but rigged economic rules, unmitigated corporate greed and unrelenting political attacks have weakened our voices, stifled our wages and eroded our economic security. Yet as we write this report, a wave of collective action is sweeping the nation. Working people across industries and demographics are joining together for a better life. This conversation is happening around us, often without us. In many of these rooms, the first item on the agenda is silencing our voices, part of an elite-driven fallacy that the future of work is something that will be done to workers instead of shaped by us. The commission, composed of the officers of the AFL-CIO and affiliated, national union leaders, is anchored by 10 subcommittees corresponding to sectors of the economy—building trades, energy, the federal sector, health care, manufacturing, professionals, the public sector, service and retail, transportation and demographic constituency groups.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: The World In 2050
SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: Talking To My Future Self In 20 Years!Content:
The future of American unions hangs in the balance
Innovative applications of AI in hotel and restaurant settings may threaten jobs in these sectors. The McKinsey Global Institute forecasts that automation will, by , destroy more than 39 million jobs in the United States, while two Oxford professors estimate that 47 percent of U. By contrast, there are plenty of seats for billionaire investors, millionaire executives, as well as consultants and technology gurus.
It often seems that the corporate executives rushing to introduce artificial intelligence, robots, and other new technologies plan to give workers as much say in these matters as zoo managers give to the animals about revamping a zoo. Just 1. Going forward, any discussions or conferences on the future of work should include at least some workers or their representatives, perhaps union officials or worker-friendly academics.
If workers or their representatives have a voice in the design and development of the technologies of tomorrow, that might help corporations and engineers design these technologies in a more worker-friendly way, perhaps minimizing worker stress or boredom. Giving workers a say might help maximize the ability of employees to work with or alongside robots and other new technologies, instead of being replaced by them. There is huge focus nowadays on developing driverless cars and trucks, but there is far less focus on how these technologies will affect the millions of people who make their livelihood as drivers—whether of trucks, taxis, or Ubers or Lyfts.
Workers should also have a say in all these discussions to help ensure that the jobs of the future are good jobs, with solid pay and benefits and a humane, non-frenetic pace of work.
Your donation keeps this site free and open for all to read. Give what you can Unions have not hired or trained nearly enough people who can speak knowledgeably on these issues. Many champions of UBI see this idea as a way to minimize worker opposition to the anticipated flood of new technologies.
Some UBI supporters assert that if UBI is instituted, safety net programs like Medicaid and food stamps will no longer be needed, and some even say Social Security and Medicare should be phased out, too. I imagine that millions of workers will have very strong opinions about these proposals to eviscerate the social safety net. While tech execs vigorously discuss UBI among themselves, a recent Hill -HarrisX poll found that Americans oppose UBI by 57 percent to 43 percent , with older workers most strongly opposed.
Many workers would much prefer to have a job than sit at home and receive UBI. The question is whether workers will be partners in its deployment or bystanders that get run over by it. The American Prospect depends on reader support. But if you have the ability to support independent, non-profit journalism, we are so grateful. Your voluntary contribution helps keep this website paywall-free.
There are many ways to give. You can use our one-time donation form. You can browse our Prospect Perks page, and sign up as a subscriber with a range of benefits, including an opt-in to receive the print magazine by mail. Whatever works for you. Skip to main content. Donate Subscribe. Back to Search Results.
Most popular articles
A recent Forbes article described how business leaders are using new technologies, big data and analytics to do business, and yet, despite the apparent control and understanding this gives them over their environment, they are still confronted with the impacts of unpredictable economic shocks, volatility, ambiguity and complexity. The Forbes article defines foresight as an action-oriented practice whereby one becomes more aware and engages in creating and leading their own realities. Here at the European Trade Union Institute ETUI we regard foresight as a means of research that uses various methods to help an organisation to think ahead, so that it can shape, create and develop plausible and different futures. In short, foresight produces and uses data that organisations can then interpret to anticipate change.
Report Unions and Labor Standards. Download PDF. Press release. Americans have always joined together—whether in parent teacher associations or local community organizations—to solve problems and make changes that improve their lives and their communities.
A Future Without Unions Is a Terrifying Dystopia
Innovative applications of AI in hotel and restaurant settings may threaten jobs in these sectors. The McKinsey Global Institute forecasts that automation will, by , destroy more than 39 million jobs in the United States, while two Oxford professors estimate that 47 percent of U. By contrast, there are plenty of seats for billionaire investors, millionaire executives, as well as consultants and technology gurus. It often seems that the corporate executives rushing to introduce artificial intelligence, robots, and other new technologies plan to give workers as much say in these matters as zoo managers give to the animals about revamping a zoo. Just 1. Going forward, any discussions or conferences on the future of work should include at least some workers or their representatives, perhaps union officials or worker-friendly academics. If workers or their representatives have a voice in the design and development of the technologies of tomorrow, that might help corporations and engineers design these technologies in a more worker-friendly way, perhaps minimizing worker stress or boredom.
Where Are the Workers When We Talk About the Future of Work?
On the face of it you might think that the future is full of potential for trade unions. Public concerns over low pay have soared to record levels over recent years. Yet none of these currents are likely to reverse a pattern of long-term decline. Membership peaked at over 13 million in and has fallen to 6.
How the internet and iPhone have changed our connection to each other and the information available to us in seconds, is a drop in the bucket to the disruptive changes coming. This is going to be a wonderful ride if youre prepared for it! Cini is the founder and CEO of www. She believes that we are living in a transformational age of technology, that will change senior living for the better, just as the internet changed how we connect with others.
For far too many, the land of opportunity has turned into a land of downsized hopes and shrunken mobility. As the stories above make clear, something is fundamentally broken in the way many American employers treat their workers. Too often employers show utter contempt for the golden rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: Q&A session on my marriage and Divorce @ 30 + Future content - The Regal Woman Project
This week, the supreme court hears a case that will probably decimate American unions by going after them in the one bastion they have left, the public sector. Unions, however, are compelled by law to provide certain services to all workers in unionized workplaces, whether they are union members or not. If a majority of workers vote to unionize, they can also vote on a contract that stipulates that non-members have to pay — in lieu of dues - agency fees to cover those services they are entitled to receive. It is, of course, a little strange for libertarian types to seek the power of government to outlaw voluntary private contracts established by democratic vote, or encourage people not to pay for entitlements. In Janus, they argue that because public employees work for the government, and due to our curious legal custom of treating money as speech, such fees are constitutionally protected political speech and no one can be required to pay them. Today, more unionized workers work for the government — local, state, or federal — than all other employers in the country combined.